More annoying Bucks discourse could be on its way after Damian Lillard rumor

If Damian Lillard signs with the Boston Celtics, it would mark the second instance of a former Milwaukee Bucks All-Star point guard joining the team, echoing Jrue Holiday's move. This would likely spark renewed criticism of the Bucks' decisions, similar to the misguided discourse following Holiday's departure.

The Bucks' trade of Holiday was difficult due to his significant contributions, including an NBA championship. However, the opportunity to acquire Damian Lillard, one of the league's top 75 players, justified the move—a decision many teams would replicate.

Criticism of the Holiday trade overlooks key context: while Holiday won a title with Boston, he had a reduced role compared to his responsibilities in Milwaukee. Media and fans also ignore his underwhelming playoff performances for the Bucks in 2022 and 2023, which directly influenced the decision to pursue an upgrade like Lillard.

Similarly, condemning the Lillard trade based solely on Holiday's success in Boston is flawed reasoning. Reports indicate a growing disconnect between Lillard and the Bucks even before his Achilles injury, with sources suggesting discussions about his future in Milwaukee were imminent had he stayed healthy.

Moving on from Lillard allowed the Bucks to acquire Myles Turner, an ideal long-term replacement for Brook Lopez. The team prioritizes players fully committed to Milwaukee, a quality Turner embodies. Lillard's apparent eagerness for free agency further signals he wasn't a long-term fit.

Should Lillard join Boston, it reflects the Celtics' effective recruitment, not a failure by the Bucks. Other teams had opportunities, but context is crucial: if Lillard desired to leave, allowing his departure is logical, even to a conference rival. Despite this, media narratives are expected to be misguided once again.