Ranking every NBA team's No. 1 option in 2025-26: Who are the league's best superstars?

The article discusses the importance of team chemistry and hierarchy in NBA teams, emphasizing that while individual talent is crucial, how well players understand and perform their roles within a team's structure is equally vital. It highlights that depth contributed to the success of teams like the Thunder and Pacers last season, but the most cohesive five-man unit remains paramount, as evidenced by three of the top four starting lineups reaching the conference finals.

In this series, each team's starters are ranked to provide a broader league-wide perspective. The ideal lineup consists of a clear hierarchy: a superstar (No. 1), a deferential co-star (No. 2), a third star who excels in their role (No. 3), a fourth option, and a fifth starter who ties everything together. Readers are encouraged to assess how closely their team aligns with this model.

A No. 1 player is described as the team's alpha, recognized by both personality and ability, with teammates following their lead and opponents focusing game plans on them. They handle clutch situations, stabilize the team during struggles, and influence the game significantly. This role includes defense, not just scoring, and encompasses the player's overall impact on the court. Examples cited include legends like LeBron James and Michael Jordan, illustrating that a true No. 1 aspires to all-time greatness and cannot be relegated to a secondary role.

The rankings project where players are expected to stand by the end of the season, leading to potential surprises, such as Victor Wembanyama's high placement despite comparisons to established stars like Stephen Curry. Subjectivity is acknowledged in these evaluations, inviting debate and discussion as part of the exercise's appeal.

Lastly, the lineups and player statuses were sourced from beat reporters across the league, with gratitude expressed for their contributions. It is noted that not all listed players may start on opening night due to factors like injuries or coaching decisions, but the rankings represent the best estimate of frequent rotations for each team.